<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOCSIS and Cable Modems &#8211; How it works :: Anatomy of a Burst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volpefirm.com/blog/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/</link>
	<description>A Technical Communications Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradyvolpe.com/?p=162#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Hi Linford,

What you are seeing is the nature of a &quot;MAC Domain&quot; and is the proper operation of a CMTS.  A MAC Domain is defined on the CMTS as the Downstream port associated with the respective upstream ports.  So on your Terayon 3500, the downstream on one line card is associated with the upstreams on that same line card, which makes up a single MAC domain.  On line card #2 you have a second MAC domain.

Some CMTS vendors, like Cisco, give you the ability to associate the downstream of one MAC domain with the upstreams of another MAC domain.  Unfortunately I have very little experience on Terayon CMTSs and have not tried to do cross-MAC domain associations.  I recommend that you consult the manual if you have one.

Good luck,
-Brady</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Linford,</p>
<p>What you are seeing is the nature of a &#8220;MAC Domain&#8221; and is the proper operation of a CMTS.  A MAC Domain is defined on the CMTS as the Downstream port associated with the respective upstream ports.  So on your Terayon 3500, the downstream on one line card is associated with the upstreams on that same line card, which makes up a single MAC domain.  On line card #2 you have a second MAC domain.</p>
<p>Some CMTS vendors, like Cisco, give you the ability to associate the downstream of one MAC domain with the upstreams of another MAC domain.  Unfortunately I have very little experience on Terayon CMTSs and have not tried to do cross-MAC domain associations.  I recommend that you consult the manual if you have one.</p>
<p>Good luck,<br />
-Brady</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linford</title>
		<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Linford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradyvolpe.com/?p=162#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I  have  a  Terayon 3500. I am using 2 Line  Cards, that is  4  US ports on each card. I am  trying to use one  downstream  frequency   for  all CM&#039;s assocaited with the  8 US&#039;s. I am finding that  the  CM&#039;s  only lock when they see  a DS  from their  corresponding line card. In other words  CM&#039;s assocaited with  Card 3 will  not  work with a  downstream from Card 2. Is this  normal, how do I correct this.

Linford</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  have  a  Terayon 3500. I am using 2 Line  Cards, that is  4  US ports on each card. I am  trying to use one  downstream  frequency   for  all CM&#8217;s assocaited with the  8 US&#8217;s. I am finding that  the  CM&#8217;s  only lock when they see  a DS  from their  corresponding line card. In other words  CM&#8217;s assocaited with  Card 3 will  not  work with a  downstream from Card 2. Is this  normal, how do I correct this.</p>
<p>Linford</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradyvolpe.com/?p=162#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Hi Aditya,

The IUCs are an output of the Burst Profile or modulation profile defined in the running-config on a Cisco CMTS.  Cisco has a lot of great online documentation for modifying their modulation profiles depending upon which CMTS model you have and which IOS you are running.  I recommend Goggling this topic and you should come up to speed rather quickly.  But you absolutely must have administrator access to the CMTS.  This is not something that can be done from the cable modem (i.e. if you are trying to hack in :-).

Regards,
-Brady</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aditya,</p>
<p>The IUCs are an output of the Burst Profile or modulation profile defined in the running-config on a Cisco CMTS.  Cisco has a lot of great online documentation for modifying their modulation profiles depending upon which CMTS model you have and which IOS you are running.  I recommend Goggling this topic and you should come up to speed rather quickly.  But you absolutely must have administrator access to the CMTS.  This is not something that can be done from the cable modem (i.e. if you are trying to hack in <img src='http://volpefirm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
-Brady</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditya</title>
		<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradyvolpe.com/?p=162#comment-125</guid>
		<description>can we force cmts to select &quot;burst profile&quot; via IUCs ?
If so which command is there for Cisco CMTS ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can we force cmts to select &#8220;burst profile&#8221; via IUCs ?<br />
If so which command is there for Cisco CMTS ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradyvolpe.com/?p=162#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Okinawajoe,

For DOCSIS 1.x and 2.0 timing sources are not easily supported for DOCSIS CMTSs.  In DOCSIS 3.0 Modular CMTS architectures, they do become mandatory and greatly improve the timing of the architecture.  Symmetricom is a provider of DOCSIS Timing References for DOCSIS 3.0 CMTSs.  I will cover this in more detail when I pick back up the DOCSIS 3.0 Tutorial series.

Regards,
-Brady</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okinawajoe,</p>
<p>For DOCSIS 1.x and 2.0 timing sources are not easily supported for DOCSIS CMTSs.  In DOCSIS 3.0 Modular CMTS architectures, they do become mandatory and greatly improve the timing of the architecture.  Symmetricom is a provider of DOCSIS Timing References for DOCSIS 3.0 CMTSs.  I will cover this in more detail when I pick back up the DOCSIS 3.0 Tutorial series.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
-Brady</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okinawajoe</title>
		<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>okinawajoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradyvolpe.com/?p=162#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to reading more on A-TDMA ... question ... is an external timing source required for A-TDMA? I seem to remember this being the case (highly suggested?) in a Symmetricom white paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to reading more on A-TDMA &#8230; question &#8230; is an external timing source required for A-TDMA? I seem to remember this being the case (highly suggested?) in a Symmetricom white paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradyvolpe.com/?p=162#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Dave,

Good catch.  I made the correction already.  I spend too much time on Cisco CMTSs where the standard minimum mini-slot time is two-ticks or 12.5 usec.  Thanks for giving feedback on my error.  Nothing worse than mis-information.

Regards,
-Brady</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Good catch.  I made the correction already.  I spend too much time on Cisco CMTSs where the standard minimum mini-slot time is two-ticks or 12.5 usec.  Thanks for giving feedback on my error.  Nothing worse than mis-information.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
-Brady</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://volpefirm.com/docsis-101/docsis101_anatomy-of-a-burst/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradyvolpe.com/?p=162#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Brady,

  Pretty sure a tick is 6.25us, not 12.5.
160,000 ticks per second = 6.25us

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brady,</p>
<p>  Pretty sure a tick is 6.25us, not 12.5.<br />
160,000 ticks per second = 6.25us</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

