3000 Old Alabama Road Suite 119-434, Alpharetta, GA 30022-8555404-424-8202info@volpefirm.com

Speeding Upstream – Part I

Post 164 of 179

DOCSIS 3.0 Tips

(Extended version from that published in Communications Technology, June 1, 2009)
By John Downey and Brady Volpe

The first part of this article (in CT's March 2009 issue) discussed downstream potential issues, while this one focuses on the potential issues associated with upstream deployments. In particular, this article covers the critical upstream areas that one should be aware of when getting ready to deploy or already deploying DOCSIS 3.0.

The business objective for many operators today is to provide faster speeds to compete with Verizon's FiOS. These speeds are for downstream and upstream. DOCSIS 2.0 can provide approximately 37 Mbps on the downstream and 27 Mbps on the upstream, aggregate speed. Some per-cable modem speeds are approaching these peak rates and exceeding them. The only way to offer higher rates than what DOCSIS 2.0 can offer is to upgrade to DOCSIS 3.0. Instead of reducing node sizes, which can exceed $10,000 per node split, the business case can quickly be made to migrate to DOCSIS 3.0.

Potential Pitfalls

As explained in the first part of this article, any new technology will have some trade-offs and potential pitfalls that we must understand and plan for in advance.  The following will discuss some of these issues:

  • Why it’s Needed – This can range from competitive pressure, to higher tiers of service, to more customers signing up.
  • Frequency Stacking Levels & Placement – What is the modem maximum US output with four channels stacked and do the channels have to be contiguous?
  • Isolation Concerns – Whenever applications have different service groups, we have overlaid networks.  Signals destined for one node could “bleed” over to another.
  • US Frequency Expansion to 85 MHz – Amplifier upgrades are occurring now.  It’s best to make the truck roll once.  Think about diplex filters, line EQs, step attenuators, taps, etc.

Note: DOCSIS 3.0 CMs support a minimum of 4 US and 4 DS channels even though it could be more.  Keep in mind that more USs in a mac domain requires more maps and “eats” into the DS throughput.  Approximately every US port uses 0.25 Mbps of DS capacity or more for maps.

DOCSIS 2.0 – ATDMA

It would be good to understand how to exploit the upstream (US) capabilities we have with DOCSIS 2.0 and its corresponding issues before moving into DOCSIS 3.0 US issues.  A quick way to increase upstream data rates is to deploy DOCSIS 2.0 in a DOCSIS 1.x system.  A 6.4 MHz wide channel using 64-QAM will provide up to 27 Mbps vs. the 9 Mbps available with a DOCSIS 1.x system.

DOCSIS 2.0 US Considerations

There are a few considerations that need to be addressed when utilizing ATDMA:

  • 64-QAM at 6.4 MHz – What levels are supported, how do modulation profiles affect levels and modulation error ratio (MER), what about frequency allocation?

Note – MER is the same as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as reported from a Cable Modem Termination System (CMTS).

  • Linear Impairments – How do group delay & micro-reflections affect per-CM MER and US port average MER, how to use pre-equalization to your advantage?
  • Laser Clipping – More channels means more power and potential laser clipping. Do you have FP or DFB lasers deployed in your return path?  If you don’t know, you should do some research.
  • Monitoring, Testing, & Troubleshooting – Proactive vs. reactive and testing with a signal that is realistic.

Linear Impairment Effect

Many times doubling the US channel width will indicate more issues with the plant than actually increasing the modulation to 64-QAM.  Linear impairments like group delay and micro- reflections will not be apparent with a spectrum analyzer, but will severely degrade US MER.

After increasing the channel width to 6.4 MHz, it’s imperative to measure and document unequalized US MER at multiple test points in the plant.  Unequalized means per-CM US MER without pre-equalization activated.  JDSU PathTrak Return Path Monitoring System with an RPM-3000 linecard can demodulate live CM signals along or a continuous 16-QAM to 64-QAM signal generated from the JDSU DSAM meter.  This provides invaluable insight into the monitoring and troubleshooting of non-linear impairments.

The recommended unequalized MER is 25 dB or higher.  Less than 25 dB reduces operating margin.  Be sure to check US MER as well as per-CM MER.  The Cisco CMTS command, “show cable modem phy”, can be used to display per-CM MER (SNR).  If diplex filter group delay is suspect in addition to long amplifier cascades, it may be necessary to pick a frequency below 30 MHz, away from diplex filter bandedge.  If group delay is causing per-CM low MER issues and a lower frequency is not an option, it may be possible to activate pre-equalization.  Be sure the latest IOS version is running on the CMTS with proper modulation profiles.

Note: US interleaving has been added in DOCSIS 2.0 and can be applied to the D2.0 A-long burst in the mod profiles for added protection to impulse noise events.

DOCSIS 2.0 has many benefits and one of those comes in the DOCSIS 2.0 CMTS linecards and is called pre-equalization.  The CMTS first analyzes the signal coming from the CM and sends correction information back to it.  The CM uses this information to pre-distort, or pre-equalize, its signal before transmission.  Now the signal travels through the HFC network and is impaired by group delay and frequency response.  The pre-distorted signal is distorted back and the CMTS actually receives a nearly ideal signal.  Pre-equalization is very useful for supporting 6.4 MHz wide channels whether using 16-QAM or 64-QAM.

The divide and conquer troubleshooting method recommended is to exclude the MAC address of a field meter (i.e. DSAM) from the CM pre-equalization process.  This will cause the DSAM to report un-equalized MER in the field, while the customer CMs are operating at a higher, pre-equalized MER.  The objective is to then use the non pre-equalized DSAM to troubleshoot the HFC network until impairments are identified and resolved, such as bad connectors and taps.  The goal is to have the non pre-equalized MER of the DSAM nearly as good as the pre-equalized MER of CMs on the same US leg.

Note: Increasing the channel width from 3.2 to 6.4 MHz keeps the same average power for a single carrier, for the Cisco implementation.  This means the MER will drop by 3 dB, and possibly more because wider channels incur more group delay.  If the CMTS kept the same power/Hz, it could cause maximum transmit levels from CMs and/or laser clipping or overload.

Understanding equalized vs. unequalized MER readings is paramount to quantifying plant issues.  Regardless if the CMs have pre-eq activated; the CMTS linecard will also have adaptive equalization.  The end user must know if the CMTS US MER is reported before or after this adaptive EQ and preamble lengths in the modulation profile could affect this.

Modulation profile choices include QPSK for maintenance, 64-QAM for Data, and possibly 16-QAM for VoIP.  Many options are possible and the station maintenance(SM) burst modulation could affect level reporting and subsequently MER.  The level reported by the CM could be based on the long burst while the CMTS level is based on the SM burst.  If Pre-EQ is activated in 1.1 & > CMs, it can greatly enhance the US per-CM MER readings, but could mask plant issues.  DOCSIS 1.1 CMs have an 8-tap EQ and DOCSIS 2.0 CMs have a 24-tap EQ.  In a simplified explanation, this can be thought of as 8 or 24 sampling points to get a “good” digital representation of the “haystack”.

Monitoring the CMTS for Plant Health
By monitoring US MER and FEC counters, a generalization can be made for the US health of the plant, but further investigation is needed.  It is recommended to also monitor per-CM FEC and MER numbers.  Another data point can be formulated with the Flap-list.  This Cisco-patent pending feature has been included in DOCSIS 3.0 as the Modem Diagnostics Log and can indicate US issues.

Table 1 below lists some recommended thresholds for alarms of different parameters.

FEC vs MER

Table 1

After deploying ATDMA, it will be necessary to monitor MER on a per US basis with the ability to drill-down for per-CM MER. Uncorrectable / Correctable FEC per US with ability to drill-down for per-CM counters will also be used.  Use Return Path monitoring tools like Cisco Broadband Troubleshooter (CBT) or PathTrak to view 5-65 MHz for apparent laser clipping.  It’s also needed to have an analyzer that can read < 5 MHz for AM radio or ham radio ingress. PathTrak can look at the 0.5 MHz - 85 MHz spectrum and also look at “real” modem US constellations.  Since the CBT tool is in the CMTS and understands minislot time assignments, it can be used to see the US with no modem bursts and also display specific modem bursts.

Flap-List

Cable Flap-List monitoring is used for CM issues caused by US noise impairments and timing issues.  The following configurations are recommended as a best practice:

cable flap-list miss-threshold 5

Modems are polled every 20 seconds (15 when linecard redundancy is configured) and correlates with a “hit” when the 3-way maintenance “handshake” is successful.  If a poll is missed, the CMTS will go into a fast mode and poll every second.  If there are five consecutive polls missed, the flap count increments by one and the miss count would increment by five.  “Misses” can be correlated with T3 timeouts from the CM log.

cable flap-list power-adjust threshold 2

If the CM has power adjustments of 2 dB or higher during one station maintenance interval, the flap count and power adjust count increment by one.

cable flap-list insertion-time 120

If the CM sends initial ranging two or more times within two minutes, the flap count increments by one.  This does not necessarily mean a modem going offline and online.  It could be a modem that goes through “init” states many times.

Some recommendations for flap-list monitoring include:

  • Periodically poll the flap-list at an appropriate interval of every 30 minutes or so.
  • Perform trend analysis to identify CMs that are consistently in the flap-list.
  • Clear the flap-list periodically (daily?) to “re-calibrate”.
  • Query the billing and administrative database for CM MAC address-to-street address translation and generate appropriate reports and work orders.  CMs in a specific area with lots of flaps can indicate a faulty amplifier or feeder lines.

Note: The bottom line is correctable & uncorrectable FEC.  If correctable FEC is incrementing, then eventually it will lead to uncorrectable FEC, which equals packet drops.  If uncorrectable is incrementing much faster than corr and/or SNR seems good, then it could be an impulse event like laser clipping, impulse noise, or sweep interference.

Summary

This concludes Part I of the extended version of our Speeding Upstream article.  Next week I will post Part II, at which time John and I will cover:

  • DOCSIS US issues such as
  • RF Levels
  • Passband
  • Channel Placement
  • Total Power
  • and Laser Clipping

We will also discuss the significant changes in upstream transmit power level of cable modems from DOCSIS 1.x and 2.0 to the new DOCSIS 3.0 specification.  Finally, we will cover isolation issues and future migration considerations in the upstream due to the new upstream expansion capabilities with DOCSIS 3.0.

John J. Downey is a broadband network engineer for Cisco Systems.

DOCSIS is a registered trademark of Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.

Mr. Volpe has over 25 years of communications industry experience. He is focused on the cable and telecom industry with deep technical and business skills. Mr. Volpe is currently the president and chief technologist of the Volpe Firm and holds an MSEE with honors.

Twitter LinkedIn Google+ 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Menu